Well...
http://www.computerandvideo...
Because their software updates work more than others. But besides this, I don't no what you're talking about.
They're talking about multi platform games in 3D probably running better on the 360.
The technique Epic uses can be seen without a 3DTV , you just need a pair of glasses and a HDTV.
" wait what?"
Yeah, I didn't understand anything you said either.
Themyst is just butthurt, ignore him or her and move on. This gen is obviously centered around online gaming and Xbox Live is just a superior service compared to what PSN is. Brainwashed? "It only does everything" is a lie, but yet you believe it. So who is really brainwashed?
@biggest, the review isn't good to you because it didn't give the game a 3.
Does it matter? Japan is somewhat irrelevant nowadays anyway.
People seem to to be short-sighted when it comes to a franchise's overall story arch. People seem to gush over the games that only have a game by game story, practically no type of background information. The problem I see with games that have a lot of back story is it's hard to get an understanding across in just one game, so a sequel has to be made.
Those are all good brands and they are highly regarded for a reason. I think these Sony pair look nice, but if they don't compare to the other brands in the same price range then that should be pointed out. With that said, I wouldn't be able to base my purchasing decision on this review. He pointed out a couple of deal breakers, IMO, at that price point, then at the end he says they're definitely worth the money. That's just too confusing for me, although I would use this revi...
As much as I love the 360, I'm not buying a $600 computer to get one for free, lol.
Why even conversate with people when all they do is get hostile over someone else's opinion? I damn sure wouldn't ask any one of you about the product since you haven't touched it.
A 7 is what the written review says. Stating that the surround sound wasn't that good and in the article he says the sound bleeds out. I can see how people don't like this review, after reading it, I'm some what confused.
Why not a 10?
Edit: Thanks for stating your reasons, although I don't look at a 10 being perfect: it's just a scale; but a 10 would mean no matter what you do, you have to experience whatever gets a 10.
In this case logic wins...
I don't think 11% warrants the term crash, lol, but I guess losing millions sucks either way.
Was R:FOM the only game you played in 2006? Because the graphics were far from jaw-dropping. Don't get me wrong, this game holds a soft spot in my heart, but the graphics were dissappointing compared to Gears and definitely when dropping $660 down for the PS3.
I'll be to busy playing Gears 3. Good luck finding that on your PC...
http://m.youtube.com/index?...
Want more? Ok...
http://m.youtube.com/index?...
The article is wrong in saying Gears 2 was a 2009 game. It came out in 2008...
"Inevitably, the team enters an arena area before being attacked. The scene’s set in a playground, and Capps is quick to highlight the boosted level of detail over the second game, claiming there are “significantly higher polygon counts” and “greatly improved lighting” over 2009’s Gears 2.
That the extra time afforded to the game has created something technically exceptional ...
With Gears 3 out this month, I could imagine September doing twice this amount.